Re: spec failure: unrecognized spec option ...

2005-05-20 Thread Zack Weinberg
Bill Northcott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 21/05/2005, at 4:02 AM, Mike Stump wrote: >>> I have now realised that it is not generated as part of the >>> compiler build process. >> It used to be. >>> Presumably these files serve some purpose. How do they affect the >>> operation of the compil

Re: spec failure: unrecognized spec option ...

2005-05-20 Thread Bill Northcott
On 21/05/2005, at 4:02 AM, Mike Stump wrote: I have now realised that it is not generated as part of the compiler build process. It used to be. Presumably these files serve some purpose. How do they affect the operation of the compiler? For the specs file, negatively. For the other, none, as

Re: spec failure: unrecognized spec option ...

2005-05-20 Thread Mike Stump
On Thursday, May 19, 2005, at 09:23 PM, Bill Northcott wrote: Clearly that is the surgical solution, but what is the file there for? No reason, or put another way, because you've installed applications that you never removed. That application was an older gcc-4.0. You can install your system f

Re: spec failure: unrecognized spec option ...

2005-05-19 Thread Bill Northcott
On 20/05/2005, at 3:51 AM, Mike Stump wrote: I have been building gcc-4.0.0 from Apple sources with tags in the apple-ppc-5000 series. I was getting lots of messages like this "spec failure: unrecognized spec option 'Q'" I amended /usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-apple-darwin8/4.0.0/specs rm -rf /usr/lib

Re: spec failure: unrecognized spec option ...

2005-05-19 Thread Mike Stump
On May 19, 2005, at 2:44 AM, Bill Northcott wrote: I have been building gcc-4.0.0 from Apple sources with tags in the apple-ppc-5000 series. I was getting lots of messages like this "spec failure: unrecognized spec option 'Q'" I amended /usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-apple-darwin8/4.0.0/specs rm -rf /u