Hi,
On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> I don't know the answer. But I do know that you need to think about
> -fasynchronous-unwind-tables, and you need to think about how your
> kernel handles registers when calling a handler, and you need to think
> about what unwind information is a
Roman Zippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> While working on a vdso for Linux/m68k I stumbled again on a problem, I
> already had with the fallback unwind handler in gcc, where I'd like to
> hear some opinions.
> I'm looking at the i386 unwind handler and that doesn't bother to restore
> any fp
