> I guess it probably doesn't apply in this case (if you've straced the
> simulator), but please also keep in mind another gotcha:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-12/msg00561.html
Yeah, doesn't apply. There were no *attempts* at I/O from the
simulator. I'm more inclined to think that th
Hi DJ
> Is sh-elf/sim supposed to support profiling? My latest tests show all
> the profiling tests failing. For example, the bprob executable has
> the name of the gcda file in it, but doesn't attempt to write it out
> (verified with strace against the simulator).
I guess it probably doesn't a
> Hmm... Did you try --with-headers?
I'll give that a try.
DJ Delorie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Is your gcc configured with --with-newlib --with-headers?
>
> $TOP/gcc/gcc/configure --prefix=$PREFIX --target=$TARGET \
> --enable-languages=c,c++ --with-newlib --with-mpfr=/usr/local
>
> I do a two-phase build. I build gcc (and let it fail for libgcc)
> Is your gcc configured with --with-newlib --with-headers?
$TOP/gcc/gcc/configure --prefix=$PREFIX --target=$TARGET \
--enable-languages=c,c++ --with-newlib --with-mpfr=/usr/local
I do a two-phase build. I build gcc (and let it fail for libgcc) to
get xgcc/cc1, then build and install newlib,
DJ Delorie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is sh-elf/sim supposed to support profiling? My latest tests show all
> the profiling tests failing. For example, the bprob executable has
> the name of the gcda file in it, but doesn't attempt to write it out
> (verified with strace against the simulator).
