> How could reload 1 not get resolved?
Well, it always does, if it gets that far.
> When you are looking at reload 2 in some predicate, can you simply
> assume that reload 1 will get resolved, and report that the mem
> matches the predicate?
Tried it, didn't help.
DJ Delorie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm looking at an insn that has these reloads [attached]. Note that
> reload2 is not needed IF the reload 1 gets resolved. I haven't
> figured out yet how to tell gcc this. Suggestions? The fb+0
> construct is something I create to recognize patterns th
