On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Amker.Cheng wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Amker.Cheng wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Richard Guenther
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> No, I think the check is superfluous and should be removed. I also wonder
>>> why we exempt BUILT_IN_FREE here ... ca
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Amker.Cheng wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Richard Guenther
> wrote:
>>
>> No, I think the check is superfluous and should be removed. I also wonder
>> why we exempt BUILT_IN_FREE here ... can you dig in SVN history a bit?
>> For both things?
Hi Rich
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
>
> No, I think the check is superfluous and should be removed. I also wonder
> why we exempt BUILT_IN_FREE here ... can you dig in SVN history a bit?
> For both things?
Thanks for clarifying. I will look into it.
--
Best Regards.
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Amker.Cheng wrote:
> Hi,
> I noticed gcc generates inconsistent codes for same function for builtin
> calls.
>
> compile following program:
> --
> #include
> int a(float x) {
> return sqrtf(x);
> }
> int b(float x)
