Diego Novillo wrote:
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 11:04, Basile STARYNKEVITCH
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I understood that all prettyprinting is systematically using an obstack as a
buffer (actually, I renamed the FILE* field to something else, and it does
not appear a lot).
I wouldn't oppose a pat
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 11:04, Basile STARYNKEVITCH
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you mean that the trend is to have both dump_* routines (writing to
> FILE*) and prettyprinting routines? Except of course the historical
> existence of code, I don't understand why both are needed (unless dumping i
Diego Novillo wrote:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am correct in assuming that pretty printing & debug dumping in GCC tend to
go thru the pretty printer abstraction of gcc/pretty-printer.h hence that
the old way of printing directly to a file (like e.g. dump_bb or debug_bb in
gcc/cfg.c for prin
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 10:13, Basile STARYNKEVITCH
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I am correct in assuming that pretty printing & debug dumping in GCC tend to
> go thru the pretty printer abstraction of gcc/pretty-printer.h hence that
> the old way of printing directly to a file (lik
