Re: poor optimisation case

2007-08-07 Thread Daniel Berlin
On 8/6/07, Alfred M. Szmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Any chance of moving to launchpad.net? > >And launchpad.net forces everyone else to remember a new username >and password. > > Launchpad is also non-free software. > Great! We'll start the migration tomorrow then!

Re: poor optimisation case

2007-08-06 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
> Any chance of moving to launchpad.net? And launchpad.net forces everyone else to remember a new username and password. Launchpad is also non-free software.

Re: poor optimisation case

2007-08-06 Thread Joe Buck
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 07:08:04PM +0100, Tristan Wibberley wrote: > On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 07:38 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > > Tristan Wibberley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > I've found a case which looks like it should be possible to optimise but > > > gcc (very recent trunk) isn't d

Re: poor optimisation case

2007-08-06 Thread Andrew Pinski
On 8/6/07, Tristan Wibberley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Any chance of moving to launchpad.net? And launchpad.net forces everyone else to remember a new username and password. Anyways the username for gcc bugzilla is your email address. -- Pinski

Re: poor optimisation case

2007-08-06 Thread Tristan Wibberley
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 07:38 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > Tristan Wibberley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I've found a case which looks like it should be possible to optimise but > > gcc (very recent trunk) isn't doing which could give improvements in > > many cases - certainly in a case I'

Re: poor optimisation case

2007-08-06 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Tristan Wibberley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've found a case which looks like it should be possible to optimise but > gcc (very recent trunk) isn't doing which could give improvements in > many cases - certainly in a case I've come across: Looks reasonable to me. Please open a missed-optimi

Re: poor optimisation case

2007-08-05 Thread Tristan Wibberley
On Sun, 2007-08-05 at 16:58 -0400, Tim Prince wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] > > The loop unfortunately can't always be written as in -DOLD as the > > implementation of an iterator adapter might use ?: to special case the > > first element of a sequence and when used in a generic algor

Re: poor optimisation case

2007-08-05 Thread Tim Prince
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi I've found a case which looks like it should be possible to optimise but gcc (very recent trunk) isn't doing which could give improvements in many cases - certainly in a case I've come across: #ifdef NEW unsigned int fn(unsigned int n, unsigned int dmax) thro