Re: performance comparison post

2010-12-14 Thread Jan Hubicka
> > Any comment on the following? > > > > http://blog.regehr.org/archives/320 > > > > 1) is due to lack of non-linear induction variable support Yep. We might however also teach unroller to fully unroll the loop if we improve constant_after_peeling. This is probably good idea too, since we do

Re: performance comparison post

2010-12-14 Thread Jan Hubicka
> Any comment on the following? > > http://blog.regehr.org/archives/320 > > 1) is due to lack of non-linear induction variable support > 5) is the same problem mentioned in pr35363 > > I have not looked at the details of others -- there are probably > related missed-optimization bugs already fil

Re: performance comparison post

2010-12-13 Thread Sebastian Pop
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:14, Xinliang David Li wrote: > Any comment on the following? > > http://blog.regehr.org/archives/320 > > 1) is due to lack of non-linear induction variable support > 5) is the same problem mentioned in pr35363 > Example 2) is now http://gcc.gnu.org/PR46928 Sebastian