Eric, Do you mean that they're noisy because of the WARNINGs? I always
find warnings annoying, perhaps test_summary should filter them out.
Yeah, that's what I meant.
Notice that for -m32, the message from the linker includes "In function
`main':"; this causes prune_gcc_output to remove tha
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 12:44:56AM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Eric Christopher wrote:
>
> > Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > > On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Eric Christopher wrote:
> > >
> > > > So, these are xfailed, but still produce quite a bit of noise on both
> > > > x86_64-darwin
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 12:44:56AM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Eric Christopher wrote:
>
> > Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > > On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Eric Christopher wrote:
> > >
> > > > So, these are xfailed, but still produce quite a bit of noise on both
> > > > x86_64-darwin
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Eric Christopher wrote:
> Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Eric Christopher wrote:
> >
> > > So, these are xfailed, but still produce quite a bit of noise on both
> > > x86_64-darwin and x86_64-linux since they fail to produce a working
> > > executable
> > > a
Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Eric Christopher wrote:
So, these are xfailed, but still produce quite a bit of noise on both
x86_64-darwin and x86_64-linux since they fail to produce a working executable
and then xfail. Should we move them to skip or link only and xfail them. With
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Eric Christopher wrote:
> So, these are xfailed, but still produce quite a bit of noise on both
> x86_64-darwin and x86_64-linux since they fail to produce a working executable
> and then xfail. Should we move them to skip or link only and xfail them. With
> link only they do
