Re: new ubsan handler

2022-12-19 Thread Martin Uecker
Am Montag, dem 19.12.2022 um 15:22 +0100 schrieb Martin Liška: > On 12/19/22 10:25, Martin Uecker wrote: > > Am Montag, dem 19.12.2022 um 09:44 +0100 schrieb Martin Liška: > > > On 12/17/22 20:35, Martin Uecker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > what is the process for adding

Re: new ubsan handler

2022-12-19 Thread Martin Liška
On 12/19/22 10:25, Martin Uecker wrote: Am Montag, dem 19.12.2022 um 09:44 +0100 schrieb Martin Liška: On 12/17/22 20:35, Martin Uecker wrote: Hi all, what is the process for adding a new UBsan handler? Hello. Yes, we sync the run-time library from LLVM project. So a new sanitizer should

Re: new ubsan handler

2022-12-19 Thread Martin Uecker
Am Montag, dem 19.12.2022 um 09:44 +0100 schrieb Martin Liška: > On 12/17/22 20:35, Martin Uecker wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > what is the process for adding a new UBsan handler? > > Hello. > > Yes, we sync the run-time library from LLVM project. So a new > sanitizer > should go there fi

Re: new ubsan handler

2022-12-19 Thread Martin Liška
On 12/17/22 20:35, Martin Uecker wrote: Hi all, what is the process for adding a new UBsan handler? Hello. Yes, we sync the run-time library from LLVM project. So a new sanitizer should go there first. We have the source in the GCC tree, but I guess this should go via LLVM? And the com