On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 18:56 -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 03:34:30PM -0700, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
> >
> > Why do we have a libstdc++ list? For questions like this...
> >
> Because this is a flaw in the libstdc++-v3 testsuite harness
> which obviously the core gcc testsui
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 03:34:30PM -0700, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
>
> Why do we have a libstdc++ list? For questions like this...
>
Because this is a flaw in the libstdc++-v3 testsuite harness
which obviously the core gcc testsuite handles properly. The
other gcc developers might have an insight
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 03:40:29PM -0700, Janis Johnson wrote:
>
> I spoke too soon. I'm now building a compiler with decimal float
> disabled and will dig into this.
>
> Janis
Janis,
Don't you have to include something like
gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
to be able to use check_effe
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 15:30 -0700, Janis Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 18:19 -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 09:44:42AM -0700, Janis Johnson wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 09:10 -0700, Janis Johnson wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 09:04 -0400, Jack Howarth w
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 03:30:34PM -0700, Janis Johnson wrote:
>
> Oh, maybe the libstdc++ tests don't support dg-require-effective-target.
>
> Janis
Janis,
Yes, doesn't it need something like...
# Skip these tests for targets that don't support this extension.
if { 