On 7/4/2014 12:08 AM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
Currently, c-cppbuiltin.c doesn't provide proper defines for this support.
> >We
> >currently define __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWAP_4, etc, in
> >pa-linux.h.
I thought that was cheating! 1/2:)
> I'll experiment with defining ATOMIC_INT_LOCK_F
On Tue, 1 Jul 2014, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 1 July 2014 20:58, John David Anglin wrote:
> > On 1-Jul-14, at 5:32 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >
> >> On 1 July 2014 09:40, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >>>
> >>> - HPPA (build log [2]), is missing all the future_base symbols and
> >>> exception_ptr1
On 01/07/14 09:40, Matthias Klose wrote:
on some linux architectures there are some symbols missing in libstdc++.so.6
built from the 4.9 branch. I didn't notice before due to a packaging bug.
affected are ARM32, HPPA, SPARC.
- ARM32 (build log [1], both soft and hard float) are missing
On 01/07/14 20:58, John David Anglin wrote:
On 1-Jul-14, at 5:32 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 1 July 2014 09:40, Matthias Klose wrote:
- HPPA (build log [2]), is missing all the future_base symbols and
exception_ptr13exception symbols, current_exception and
rethrow_exception.
This i
On 1-Jul-14, at 4:40 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
Looks like more than one issue is involved, I remember that the
math symbols were already dropped in earlier versions for other
architectures. The build is configured -with-long-double-128.
Long double is 64 bits on hppa-linux.
Dave
--
John
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 10:40:06AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> on some linux architectures there are some symbols missing in libstdc++.so.6
> built from the 4.9 branch. I didn't notice before due to a packaging bug.
> affected are ARM32, HPPA, SPARC.
>
> - ARM32 (build log [1], both soft and
On 1 July 2014 20:58, John David Anglin wrote:
> On 1-Jul-14, at 5:32 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
>> On 1 July 2014 09:40, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>>
>>> - HPPA (build log [2]), is missing all the future_base symbols and
>>> exception_ptr13exception symbols, current_exception and
>>> rethrow_ex
On 1-Jul-14, at 5:32 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 1 July 2014 09:40, Matthias Klose wrote:
- HPPA (build log [2]), is missing all the future_base symbols and
exception_ptr13exception symbols, current_exception and
rethrow_exception.
This implies ATOMIC_INT_LOCK_FREE <= 1 for that target.
Am 01.07.2014 11:32, schrieb Jonathan Wakely:
> On 1 July 2014 09:40, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> - HPPA (build log [2]), is missing all the future_base symbols and
>>exception_ptr13exception symbols, current_exception and
>>rethrow_exception.
>
> This implies ATOMIC_INT_LOCK_FREE <= 1 for t
On 1 July 2014 09:40, Matthias Klose wrote:
> - HPPA (build log [2]), is missing all the future_base symbols and
>exception_ptr13exception symbols, current_exception and
>rethrow_exception.
This implies ATOMIC_INT_LOCK_FREE <= 1 for that target. Our future and
exception_ptr implementation
On 6/18/07, costin_c <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/18/07, costin_c <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the following code, compiled with
> g++ cls.cc -Wall -W -g3 -o cls
>
> why only only virtual functions f1, f2 and constructor is listed by nm.
Because they are needed for the vtable. While f
On 6/18/07, costin_c <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In the following code, compiled with
g++ cls.cc -Wall -W -g3 -o cls
why only only virtual functions f1, f2 and constructor is listed by nm.
Only debugging symbols for virtual functions are included in
executable output file ?
//cls.cc
#include
12 matches
Mail list logo
