Hi Paolo
> It supports all the bells and whistles like bubblestraps and
> restageN, which help during development. make restrap (taking a
> non-bootstrap build and using it as stage1) is not supported. make
> restageN is called make all-stageN, and there is also make
> all-stageN-gcc to rebuild gc
Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> What about bubblestrap?
>>
>> (See also http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25438)
>>
>>
> A "make" from a toplevel is equivalent to the old "make bubblestrap"
> or "make -C bubblestrap". In practice "make" just does the right
> thing, compiling
Christian Joensson wrote:
What about bubblestrap?
(See also http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25438)
A "make" from a toplevel is equivalent to the old "make bubblestrap" or
"make -C bubblestrap". In practice "make" just does the right thing,
compiling all that is needed to not h
What about bubblestrap?
(See also http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25438)
--
Cheers,
/ChJ
Will make quickstrap do the same as "make all"?
No, there's no "make quickstrap" at all! Citing from the "Top-Level
Bootstrap" wiki page:
Toplevel bootstrap is able to bootstrap a compiler with separate
reconfigurations and rebuilds of libiberty/libcpp/gcc in all the three
stages. It is
On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 19:01 +0100, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
> Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > In previous versions of GCC before yesterday, "make all" used to do a
> > normal build
> > but now I am getting a full bootstrap which is not what I wanted as I
> > was just testing
> > objecti
Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In previous versions of GCC before yesterday, "make all" used to do a
> normal build
> but now I am getting a full bootstrap which is not what I wanted as I
> was just testing
> objective-C and libobjc changes and nothing else.
>
> Is this is deliberate
Andrew Pinski wrote:
> Is this is deliberate change or just a mistake?
I'm pretty sure is deliberate and --disable-bootstrap is the config you
need.
Paolo.
