On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 08:29 -0500, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> The project I'm proposing is not to move to C++. Just to move to the
> intersection of C and C++, which is what we had agreed on in previous
> discussions. Someone needs to implement those decisions, that is what
> I'm trying to do (of c
On Wed, 25 May 2005, Theodore Papadopoulo wrote:
| All that being said, I do not know why this C++ transition should be
| blocked by libstdc++ ABI stability. Given the history the GCC project
| and the amount of work (and the expected benefits) that would arise just
| from converting to a simple s
On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 10:37 +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> >>Why? To be honest, I keep harping on this mostly because I think it
> >>should happen. All the C++-in-GCC noise is a digression.
> [.]
> In practice, we have got an handful of bugs unfixable within the
> current
> ABI (mostly alrea
