Re: libstdc++, gdb and darwin

2008-10-03 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Jack Howarth wrote: > On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 08:29:40PM -0500, Peter O'Gorman wrote: >> Jack Howarth wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 11:31:13AM -0500, Peter O'Gorman wrote: Jack Howarth wrote: > Does anyone know why gdb appears to be unable to find the debug > information

Re: libstdc++, gdb and darwin

2008-10-03 Thread Jack Howarth
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 08:29:40PM -0500, Peter O'Gorman wrote: > Jack Howarth wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 11:31:13AM -0500, Peter O'Gorman wrote: > >> Jack Howarth wrote: > >>> Does anyone know why gdb appears to be unable to find the debug > >>> information > >>> for libstdc++ in gcc

Re: libstdc++, gdb and darwin

2008-10-03 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Jack Howarth wrote: > On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 11:31:13AM -0500, Peter O'Gorman wrote: >> Jack Howarth wrote: >>> Does anyone know why gdb appears to be unable to find the debug >>> information >>> for libstdc++ in gcc 4.3 and gcc trunk on darwin9? This has been reported >>> before >>> as... >

Re: libstdc++, gdb and darwin

2008-10-03 Thread Jack Howarth
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 11:31:13AM -0500, Peter O'Gorman wrote: > Jack Howarth wrote: > > Does anyone know why gdb appears to be unable to find the debug > > information > > for libstdc++ in gcc 4.3 and gcc trunk on darwin9? This has been reported > > before > > as... > > > > https://trac.ma

Re: Update libtool? (was: Re: libstdc++, gdb and darwin)

2008-08-06 Thread Jack Howarth
Peter, You are going to fix this on gcc trunk in any case, right? Jack On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 11:17:03AM -0500, Peter O'Gorman wrote: > Jack Howarth wrote: > > Peter, > > Thanks. If gcc's libtool is missing this dsymutil workaround, it would > > be nice if this could be f

Update libtool? (was: Re: libstdc++, gdb and darwin)

2008-08-06 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Jack Howarth wrote: > Peter, > Thanks. If gcc's libtool is missing this dsymutil workaround, it would > be nice if this could be fixed for both gcc trunk and 4.3.2. > Jack I went and looked for the patches that added dsymutil to libtool, looks like I took the opport

Re: libstdc++, gdb and darwin

2008-08-05 Thread Jack Howarth
Peter, Thanks. If gcc's libtool is missing this dsymutil workaround, it would be nice if this could be fixed for both gcc trunk and 4.3.2. Jack On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 11:31:13AM -0500, Peter O'Gorman wrote: > Jack Howarth wrote: > > Does anyone know why gdb app

Re: libstdc++, gdb and darwin

2008-08-05 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Jack Howarth wrote: > Does anyone know why gdb appears to be unable to find the debug > information > for libstdc++ in gcc 4.3 and gcc trunk on darwin9? This has been reported > before > as... > > https://trac.macports.org/ticket/16102 > > Under current gcc trunk, using Apple's current Xcod