Re: libgcc-math

2007-01-11 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Richard -- | | The GCC SC has been discussing libgcc-math. RMS says that he will need | to consider the issue, and that he has other things he wants to do | first. So, I'm afraid that we can't give you a good timeline for a | resolution of the questio

Re: libgcc-math specification

2006-08-05 Thread Richard Guenther
On 8/4/06, Sashan Govender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Is there a specification that describes a set of routines for libgcc-math? I read through previous emails on this topic and it seems that it has been removed from head. I'd like to contribute but not sure what direction to go in. Is there

Re: libgcc-math and the gcc 4.2 release

2006-05-17 Thread John David Anglin
> Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | As far as I understand we (GCC) have to develop our own codes > | independently of glibc unless RMS agrees to have copies/forks of > | glibc code in GCC (this includes license changes to GPL + libgcc exception > | like in this case). What is fin

Re: libgcc-math and the gcc 4.2 release

2006-05-17 Thread Mark Mitchell
Richard Guenther wrote: > Hi, > > Following RMS request of removing source copies of other projects I > asked him if he considers it ok to have copies of the generic math > transcendentals routines of glibc in libgcc-math and to distribute > them under GPL + libgcc exception clause license. He de

Re: libgcc-math and the gcc 4.2 release

2006-05-17 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] | As far as I understand we (GCC) have to develop our own codes | independently of glibc unless RMS agrees to have copies/forks of | glibc code in GCC (this includes license changes to GPL + libgcc exception | like in this case). What is fine a

Re: libgcc-math and the gcc 4.2 release

2006-05-17 Thread Richard Guenther
On Wed, 17 May 2006, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | Hi, > | > | Following RMS request of removing source copies of other projects I > | asked him if he considers it ok to have copies of the generic math > | transcendentals routines of glibc in libgcc

Re: libgcc-math and the gcc 4.2 release

2006-05-17 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Hi, | | Following RMS request of removing source copies of other projects I | asked him if he considers it ok to have copies of the generic math | transcendentals routines of glibc in libgcc-math and to distribute | them under GPL + libgcc exception