Re: lib2funcs and fpbit both rely on each other

2005-09-15 Thread Eric Fisher
2005/9/15, Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Thursday 15 September 2005 10:59, Eric Fisher wrote: > > Hello, > > > > When building Libgcc with new porting gcc, _floatdidf.o failed for > > undefined symbol > > _floatsidf. I've been told that _floatsidf is in fpbit.c as > > _si_to_df.o. Then I mod

RE: lib2funcs and fpbit both rely on each other

2005-09-15 Thread Dave Korn
Original Message >From: Paul Brook >Sent: 15 September 2005 14:25 > On Thursday 15 September 2005 10:59, Eric Fisher wrote: >> Hello, >> >> When building Libgcc with new porting gcc, _floatdidf.o failed for >> undefined symbol _floatsidf. I've been told that _floatsidf is in >> fpbit.c as

Re: lib2funcs and fpbit both rely on each other

2005-09-15 Thread Paul Brook
On Thursday 15 September 2005 10:59, Eric Fisher wrote: > Hello, > > When building Libgcc with new porting gcc, _floatdidf.o failed for > undefined symbol > _floatsidf. I've been told that _floatsidf is in fpbit.c as > _si_to_df.o. Then I modified the libgcc.mk and firstly build fpbit. > But _pack_