On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> On 05/05/2014 08:47 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> It really depends on how "3x" should materialize in the end.
>>> How do you triplicate ops with side-effects? If you only
>>> triplica
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 05/05/2014 08:47 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> It really depends on how "3x" should materialize in the end.
>> How do you triplicate ops with side-effects? If you only
>> triplicate ops without side-effects what is the sink that keeps
>> th
On 05/05/2014 08:47 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> It really depends on how "3x" should materialize in the end.
> How do you triplicate ops with side-effects? If you only
> triplicate ops without side-effects what is the sink that keeps
> the duplicated ops live?
The vote, surely. CSE would be abso
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Daniel Gutson
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>assuming the need to generate code in which
> almost everything is used 3x (e.g. 3x registers,
> 3 times data, etc.) for a specific purpose (*) for any
> given target,
> what would be the best way to implement it?
>
> (let's name t
