On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 15:09 +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Ramana
> Radhakrishnan wrote:
> > I wonder if the best way to fix this is to teach ifcvt.c to handle
> > conditional returns.
>
> Yes. This is a bug in the middle-end. I can only guess why you are
> the
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Ramana
Radhakrishnan wrote:
> I wonder if the best way to fix this is to teach ifcvt.c to handle
> conditional returns.
Yes. This is a bug in the middle-end. I can only guess why you are
the first to run into this (the ia64 return instruction is not
predicable?) b
On Sun, 29 May 2005, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> I don't understand what lines 2728 to 2741 are for. Could someone give
> an example of when we can have a then_bb that has no successors, but
> still ends in something that satisfies simplejump_p()? What kind of
> strange indirect jump would that be?
