Re: i686 bootstrap failure in revision 110699: looping in

2006-02-08 Thread Diego Novillo
Andrew Pinski wrote: > var_can_have_subvars (tree v) > { > + > + /* Volatile variables should never have subvars. */ > No vertical space here.

Re: i686 bootstrap failure in revision 110699: looping in

2006-02-08 Thread Andrew Pinski
> > On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 12:28 -0500, Andrew Pinski wrote: > > > > > > I've build in a unified (symlink) tree, with sourceware stuff checked > > > out via cvs from date/time D2006.02.07.17.00.00 > > > > I am reducing this failure and will file a bug report. > > > > This failure is actually a

Re: i686 bootstrap failure in revision 110699: looping in execute_pre

2006-02-08 Thread Daniel Berlin
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 12:28 -0500, Andrew Pinski wrote: > > > > I've build in a unified (symlink) tree, with sourceware stuff checked > > out via cvs from date/time D2006.02.07.17.00.00 > > I am reducing this failure and will file a bug report. > This failure is actually a latent bug elsewhere

Re: i686 bootstrap failure in revision 110699: looping in execute_pre

2006-02-08 Thread Andrew Pinski
> > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > --040002010104040902030106 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > Andrew Pinski wrote: > > >>I've build in a unified (symlink) tree, with sourceware stuff checked > >>out vi

Re: i686 bootstrap failure in revision 110699: looping in execute_pre

2006-02-08 Thread Joern RENNECKE
Andrew Pinski wrote: I've build in a unified (symlink) tree, with sourceware stuff checked out via cvs from date/time D2006.02.07.17.00.00 I am reducing this failure and will file a bug report. I've just got a reduced test case, to be compiled with -O2 - see attachment. struct gdb_e

Re: i686 bootstrap failure in revision 110699: looping in execute_pre

2006-02-08 Thread Andrew Pinski
> > I've build in a unified (symlink) tree, with sourceware stuff checked > out via cvs from date/time D2006.02.07.17.00.00 I am reducing this failure and will file a bug report. Thanks, Andrew Pinski