> > I have an hpux11.0 box available, and could run tests of your patch
> > if you like.
> I doubt it would have (or will make) much of a difference at this
> point. I don't think anyone could have predicted the muck-up with
> the arguments passed to ld and the re-bootstrap that had to run
> after
On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 16:17 -0700, Joe Buck wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 03:53:18PM -0600, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
> > (*) The hpux11 target description assumes that the linker shipped with
> > hpux11 supports +init as an option. Well, that may work OK for some
> > versions of hpux11, but it cer
