RE: harm in ARM

2025-06-18 Thread Bob Dubner
> -Original Message- > From: Richard Biener > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2025 09:28 > To: James K. Lowden > Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Bob Dubner > Subject: Re: harm in ARM > > On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 7:51 PM James K. Lowden > wrote: > > > > The

Re: harm in ARM

2025-06-18 Thread James K. Lowden
On Wed, 18 Jun 2025 15:28:29 +0200 Richard Biener wrote: > That means, the adjustment should end up unifying the FUNCTION_DECL > used for all calls. Thank you. Not to put words in his mouth, but I think that's what Bob suspected. > Btw, is there any way that the thing 'prog' calls can turn o

Re: harm in ARM

2025-06-18 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc
On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 3:28 PM Richard Biener wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 7:51 PM James K. Lowden > wrote: > > > > The COBOL FE emits code for a recent ARM VM that is definitely not what > > the user or, ahem, the FE author intended. The observed behavior is > > that the program enters a

Re: harm in ARM

2025-06-18 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc
On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 7:51 PM James K. Lowden wrote: > > The COBOL FE emits code for a recent ARM VM that is definitely not what > the user or, ahem, the FE author intended. The observed behavior is > that the program enters an infinite loop calling the main entry point, > eventually exhausting