On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 02:12:32PM +0200, Michael Matz wrote:
> On Fri, 11 May 2012, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
>
> > However, the type gimple_seq still appears in a lot of source files
> > (mostly gcc/gimple*.c & gcc/tree*.c)
> >
> > Is this intended, or is this a temporary situation, and
>
Hi,
On Fri, 11 May 2012, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> However, the type gimple_seq still appears in a lot of source files
> (mostly gcc/gimple*.c & gcc/tree*.c)
>
> Is this intended, or is this a temporary situation, and
> further patches would remove all occurrences of gimple_seq everywhere?
