On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 12:49:16AM +0100, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On 3/17/06, Steve Kargl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > If
> > you really want to expose getarg_ and iargc_, look at abort_.
>
> I really do want to somehow make it easy for people to link against
> libgfortran when they are comp
On 3/17/06, Steve Kargl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Careful. libgfortran attempts to keep its namespace clean
> by appending gfortran_ to its intrinsics procedure.
I know, I invented that, sort of (/me does the Al Gore "I invented..."
shuffle ;-)
> If
> you really want to expose getarg_ and
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 12:13:30AM +0100, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> I'm looking for suggestions for how to fix this in libgfortran.
> I would fix this in Scilab, except that if gfortran is to be a
> drop-in replacement for g77, then we shouldn't have this kind of
> rather silly compatibilty issues.
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 12:13:30AM +0100, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So this Mandriva guy tells me gfortran can't compile Scilab, and
> he is right! Scilab is a pretty important piece of Fortran that
> many people use, so it is a shame that gfortran can't build it
> right now. But the reas
