On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 12:26:38PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:59 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 12:29 AM, Martin Jambor wrote:
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> >
>> >> > today I have encoun
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 03:05:32PM +0100, Martin Jambor wrote:
> In this particular case, the ofset of var_array + its max_size (the
> size of its element, as the function computes it, this is something I
> also do not really understand)
No, it's not the element size, it's the size of the who
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 12:26:38PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:59 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 12:29 AM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > today I have encountered an unpleasant problem with the function
> >> > get_ref_
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:59 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 12:29 AM, Martin Jambor wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > today I have encountered an unpleasant problem with the function
>> > get_ref_base_and_extent() when it claimed a known and constant offset
>> > for the express
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 12:29 AM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > today I have encountered an unpleasant problem with the function
> > get_ref_base_and_extent() when it claimed a known and constant offset
> > for the expression insn_4(D)->u.fld[arg.82_3].rt_rtvec. (arg being a
> >
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 12:29 AM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> today I have encountered an unpleasant problem with the function
> get_ref_base_and_extent() when it claimed a known and constant offset
> for the expression insn_4(D)->u.fld[arg.82_3].rt_rtvec. (arg being a
> default_def pa
