Re: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-5.c

2005-11-13 Thread Eric Botcazou
> A patch to fix this regression was committed earlier today to GCC4.1. Works fine on SPARC. Thanks! -- Eric Botcazou

Re: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-5.c

2005-11-13 Thread Razya Ladelsky
Hi Eric, A patch to fix this regression was committed earlier today to GCC4.1. Razya > Hi Razya, > > > Yes, I am aware of this problem. > > It does not fail for power and I'm trying to figure out why it fails for > > x86 architecture. > > It appears that the type of the constant being passed

Re: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-5.c

2005-11-13 Thread Eric Botcazou
Hi Razya, > Yes, I am aware of this problem. > It does not fail for power and I'm trying to figure out why it fails for > x86 architecture. > It appears that the type of the constant being passed to a function having > a short parameter, is an int while I expected it to be short. > > call to g :

Re: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-5.c

2005-10-23 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Razya Ladelsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It does not fail for power and I'm trying to figure out why it fails for > x86 architecture. > It appears that the type of the constant being passed to a function having > a short parameter, is an int while I expected it to be short. > > call to g :

Re: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-5.c

2005-10-23 Thread Eric Botcazou
> It does not fail for power and I'm trying to figure out why it fails for > x86 architecture. SPARC is also affected, but in 32-bit mode only. -- Eric Botcazou

Re: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-5.c

2005-10-23 Thread Razya Ladelsky
Andreas Jaeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 20/10/2005 18:08:56: > > Hi Razya, > > you developed the following tests: > > 2005-10-12 Razya Ladelsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * g++.dg/ipa/ipa-1.c: New test. > * g++.dg/ipa/ipa-2.c: New test. > * g++.dg/ipa/ipa-3.c: New tes