Hi Joseph,
> On 23 Aug 2019, at 17:14, Joseph Myers wrote:
>
> On Fri, 23 Aug 2019, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>
>> absolutely, it’s the psABI that’s lacking here - the compilers (as commented
>> by Richard Smith in a referenced thread) should not be making ABI up…
>
> With over 50 target architecture
I was pointed at
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26462
for the LLVM discussion of this problem.
Another issue here is that we should have ABI testing for atomic.
For instance, gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/compat has no atomic testcases.
Likewise g++.dg/compat.
Jim
On Fri, 23 Aug 2019, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> absolutely, it’s the psABI that’s lacking here - the compilers (as commented
> by Richard Smith in a referenced thread) should not be making ABI up…
With over 50 target architectures supported in GCC, most of which probably
don't have anyone maintaining
On Fri, 23 Aug 2019, 11:13 Iain Sandoe, wrote:
>
>
> > On 23 Aug 2019, at 10:35, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 23 Aug 2019 at 08:21, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Jim,
> >>
> >>> On 23 Aug 2019, at 00:56, Jim Wilson wrote:
> >>>
> >>> We got a change request for the RISC-V psABI to d
> On 23 Aug 2019, at 10:35, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On Fri, 23 Aug 2019 at 08:21, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>>> On 23 Aug 2019, at 00:56, Jim Wilson wrote:
>>>
>>> We got a change request for the RISC-V psABI to define the atomic
>>> structure size and alignment. And looking
On Fri, 23 Aug 2019 at 08:21, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> > On 23 Aug 2019, at 00:56, Jim Wilson wrote:
> >
> > We got a change request for the RISC-V psABI to define the atomic
> > structure size and alignment. And looking at this, it turned out that
> > gcc and clang are implementing th
Hi Jim,
> On 23 Aug 2019, at 00:56, Jim Wilson wrote:
>
> We got a change request for the RISC-V psABI to define the atomic
> structure size and alignment. And looking at this, it turned out that
> gcc and clang are implementing this differently. Consider this
> testcase
>
> rohan:2274$ cat t
