On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 11:17 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
Sorry for the belated response; various comments inline throughout...
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 3:10 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 17:20 +0200, Michael Matz wrote:
> >> Hi David,
> >>
> >> On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, David
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 3:10 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 17:20 +0200, Michael Matz wrote:
>> Hi David,
>>
>> On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, David Malcolm wrote:
>>
>> > Is it possible for you to post your work-in-progress code somewhere?
>>
>> Attached.
>
> Many thanks for posting this!
On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 17:20 +0200, Michael Matz wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, David Malcolm wrote:
>
> > Is it possible for you to post your work-in-progress code somewhere?
>
> Attached.
Many thanks for posting this! Various comments inline below.
> > I know that you don't feel
Hi David,
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, David Malcolm wrote:
> Is it possible for you to post your work-in-progress code somewhere?
Attached.
> I know that you don't feel it's ready for committing, but I would find
> it helpful - I'm interested in understanding the general approach,
> rather than seei
On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 13:54 +0200, Michael Matz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> > > Thoughts?
> >
> > Micha was also working on the proposed introspection API, I blame him
> > for not posting anything about this despite it's being "ready" since a
> > few month
Hi,
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > Thoughts?
>
> Micha was also working on the proposed introspection API, I blame him
> for not posting anything about this despite it's being "ready" since a
> few months...
He. I didn't yet come to make the changes about operand inspectors
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 6:31 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> After a hiatus, I've restarted work on an API for GCC plugins -
> specifically, a C API (given that my plugin is written in C, I have more
> interest in that than a C++ API).
>
> BTW, how many other GCC plugins are written in C?
>
> It's still