On Aug 25, 2006, at 7:35 PM, Eric Christopher wrote:
Yes, it's a necessary part of the x86_64 work - the question is
whether or not x86_64-darwin might go in for 4.2 at all.
Mark has recently stated his position (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
patches/2006-08/msg00924.html) on patches that are va
Eric,
It would be rather unfortunate if Darwin x86_64 support didn't go
in (as long as it doesn't destabilize the Darwin ppc port). Currently
we in the fink project are already living with bastardized
gcc 4.2 prereleases in order to have any Macintel support.
I had hoped we could latch onto the
Jack Howarth wrote:
Eric,
Does that imply that the TImode patch is a must have
for Darwin x86_64 in the gcc 4.2 release? If so you might try
to convince Geoff that it really should go into gcc trunk
before the branch occurs. Frankly I was aghast to discover
yesterday that the folks doing the I
Eric,
Does that imply that the TImode patch is a must have
for Darwin x86_64 in the gcc 4.2 release? If so you might try
to convince Geoff that it really should go into gcc trunk
before the branch occurs. Frankly I was aghast to discover
yesterday that the folks doing the Irix port managed to ge
So the problem on Darwin seems to be with conversion of the float results to
integer results.
Geoff has said he has done all he intends to with TImode for now so perhaps
someone else more
interested might take a look at this bug (which may well be independent of, but
exposed by the
TImode sup
