Re: default_weaktoshared timeouts

2010-04-21 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 21 April 2010 21:54, Jack Howarth wrote: > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 08:07:48PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> On 3 April 2010 00:16, Jack Howarth wrote: >> > >> > Jonathan, >> >    The test program when compiled as i386 randomly hangs under both the >> > 32-bit and 64-bit >> > kernels on Darwi

Re: default_weaktoshared timeouts

2010-04-21 Thread Jack Howarth
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 08:07:48PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 3 April 2010 00:16, Jack Howarth wrote: > > > > Jonathan, > >    The test program when compiled as i386 randomly hangs under both the > > 32-bit and 64-bit > > kernels on Darwin 10.3.0. I've emailed Mike Stump an Instruments tra

Re: default_weaktoshared timeouts

2010-04-21 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 3 April 2010 00:16, Jack Howarth wrote: > > Jonathan, >    The test program when compiled as i386 randomly hangs under both the > 32-bit and 64-bit > kernels on Darwin 10.3.0. I've emailed Mike Stump an Instruments trace file > sampling the > hung binary. Unfortunately, I don't know how to con

Re: default_weaktoshared timeouts

2010-04-02 Thread Jack Howarth
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 06:10:29PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 2 April 2010 14:12, Jack Howarth wrote: > > > > Paolo, > >   I don't believe this occurs with the x86_64-apple-darwin10 > > target but only with i686-apple-darwin10 so it may well be > > a bug in the 32-bit linker on darwin. I'll

Re: default_weaktoshared timeouts

2010-04-02 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 2 April 2010 14:12, Jack Howarth wrote: > > Paolo, >   I don't believe this occurs with the x86_64-apple-darwin10 > target but only with i686-apple-darwin10 so it may well be > a bug in the 32-bit linker on darwin. I'll try benchmarking the > actual linkage command at both 32-bit and 64-bit to s

Re: default_weaktoshared timeouts

2010-04-02 Thread Jack Howarth
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 02:15:05PM +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote: > On 04/02/2010 02:09 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > > Is there a PR related to this and if not shouldn't one be opened? > > > I never times out for me on x86 and x86_64-linux. Thus, if you want to > open one, I would suggest a target PR.

Re: default_weaktoshared timeouts

2010-04-02 Thread Paolo Carlini
On 04/02/2010 02:09 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > Is there a PR related to this and if not shouldn't one be opened? > I never times out for me on x86 and x86_64-linux. Thus, if you want to open one, I would suggest a target PR. Jon may know better... Paolo.