On 2015.06.06 at 18:52 -0400, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> On 06/06/2015 05:47 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> > On 06/06/2015 03:33 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >> Aldy,
> >> also at PPC64le LTO bootstrap (at gcc112) dies with:
> >> ^
> >> 0x104ae8f7 check_die
> >> ../../gcc/dwarf2out.c:5715
> >
> > H
On June 7, 2015 6:00:05 PM GMT+02:00, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>On 06/07/2015 11:25 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On June 7, 2015 5:03:30 PM GMT+02:00, Aldy Hernandez
> wrote:
>>> On 06/06/2015 05:49 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Bootstrap fails on aarch64:
Comparing stages 2 and 3
war
On 06/07/2015 11:25 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On June 7, 2015 5:03:30 PM GMT+02:00, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
On 06/06/2015 05:49 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Bootstrap fails on aarch64:
Comparing stages 2 and 3
warning: gcc/cc1objplus-checksum.o differs
warning: gcc/cc1obj-checksum.o differs
warnin
On June 7, 2015 5:03:30 PM GMT+02:00, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>On 06/06/2015 05:49 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> Bootstrap fails on aarch64:
>>
>> Comparing stages 2 and 3
>> warning: gcc/cc1objplus-checksum.o differs
>> warning: gcc/cc1obj-checksum.o differs
>> warning: gcc/cc1plus-checksum.o differ
On 06/06/2015 05:49 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Bootstrap fails on aarch64:
Comparing stages 2 and 3
warning: gcc/cc1objplus-checksum.o differs
warning: gcc/cc1obj-checksum.o differs
warning: gcc/cc1plus-checksum.o differs
warning: gcc/cc1-checksum.o differs
Bootstrap comparison failure!
gcc/ira-c
On 06/07/2015 07:28 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Bootstrap fails on aarch64:
Comparing stages 2 and 3
warning: gcc/cc1objplus-checksum.o differs
warning: gcc/cc1obj-checksum.o differs
warning: gcc/cc1plus-checksum.o differs
warning: gcc
On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Bootstrap fails on aarch64:
>
> Comparing stages 2 and 3
> warning: gcc/cc1objplus-checksum.o differs
> warning: gcc/cc1obj-checksum.o differs
> warning: gcc/cc1plus-checksum.o differs
> warning: gcc/cc1-checksum.o differs
> Bootstrap compar
Another fallout:
FAIL: obj-c++.dg/try-catch-5.mm -fgnu-runtime (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
: warning: '_OBJC_Module' defined but not used [-Wunused-variable]
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"A
This caused https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2015-06/msg00602.html.
TIA
Dominique
> > On 06/06/2015 03:33 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > >Aldy,
> > >also at PPC64le LTO bootstrap (at gcc112) dies with:
> > >^
> > >0x104ae8f7 check_die
> > > ../../gcc/dwarf2out.c:5715
> >
> > Hmmm... this is in the LTO/ltrans stage? If so, that's weird. The
> > LTO path does not do the ear
> On 06/06/2015 03:33 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >Aldy,
> >also at PPC64le LTO bootstrap (at gcc112) dies with:
> >^
> >0x104ae8f7 check_die
> > ../../gcc/dwarf2out.c:5715
>
> Hmmm... this is in the LTO/ltrans stage? If so, that's weird. The
> LTO path does not do the early DIE dance. Sin
On 06/06/2015 05:47 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
On 06/06/2015 03:33 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Aldy,
also at PPC64le LTO bootstrap (at gcc112) dies with:
^
0x104ae8f7 check_die
../../gcc/dwarf2out.c:5715
Hmmm... this is in the LTO/ltrans stage? If so, that's weird. The LTO
path does not d
On 06/06/2015 03:33 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Aldy,
also at PPC64le LTO bootstrap (at gcc112) dies with:
^
0x104ae8f7 check_die
../../gcc/dwarf2out.c:5715
Hmmm... this is in the LTO/ltrans stage? If so, that's weird. The LTO
path does not do the early DIE dance. Since check_die() is a
Aldy,
also at PPC64le LTO bootstrap (at gcc112) dies with:
^
0x104ae8f7 check_die
../../gcc/dwarf2out.c:5715
0x104e4e1b dwarf2out_decl
../../gcc/dwarf2out.c:21886
0x104d8a87 dwarf2out_abstract_function
../../gcc/dwarf2out.c:18457
0x104dd3e7 gen_inlined_subroutine_die
On 06/06/2015 09:20 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Aldy Hernandez writes:
Does the attached fix the ia64 failure?
commit 6c40c8f011bbd09ea92749f3925db83f249baf74
Author: Aldy Hernandez
Date: Sat Jun 6 06:48:40 2015 -0400
* dwarf2out.c (gen_lexical_block_die): Initialize stmt_die.
Yes
Andreas Schwab writes:
> FAIL: gcc.dg/autopar/pr46885.c (test for excess errors)
> Excess errors:
> xgcc: error:
> /daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20150606/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/autopar/pr46885.c:
> -fcompare-debug failure
As it turned out, this is a fallout from a different commit.
Andreas.
--
Andrea
Aldy Hernandez writes:
> Does the attached fix the ia64 failure?
>
> commit 6c40c8f011bbd09ea92749f3925db83f249baf74
> Author: Aldy Hernandez
> Date: Sat Jun 6 06:48:40 2015 -0400
>
> * dwarf2out.c (gen_lexical_block_die): Initialize stmt_die.
Yes, it does.
Thanks, Andreas.
--
Andrea
On 06/06/2015 05:49 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Bootstrap fails on aarch64:
Comparing stages 2 and 3
warning: gcc/cc1objplus-checksum.o differs
warning: gcc/cc1obj-checksum.o differs
warning: gcc/cc1plus-checksum.o differs
warning: gcc/cc1-checksum.o differs
Bootstrap comparison failure!
gcc/ira-c
Bootstrap fails on aarch64:
Comparing stages 2 and 3
warning: gcc/cc1objplus-checksum.o differs
warning: gcc/cc1obj-checksum.o differs
warning: gcc/cc1plus-checksum.o differs
warning: gcc/cc1-checksum.o differs
Bootstrap comparison failure!
gcc/ira-costs.o differs
gcc/tree-sra.o differs
gcc/tree-p
Aldy Hernandez writes:
> The debug-early work has been merged into mainline.
>
> There is a known Ada failure which Eric B. knows about and approved, and
> for which there is an appropriate FIXME note in the Ada sources:
>
> +FAIL: gnat.dg/specs/debug1.ads scan-assembler-times DW_AT_artificial 17
On June 5, 2015 9:06:01 PM GMT+02:00, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>The debug-early work has been merged into mainline.
>
>There is a known Ada failure which Eric B. knows about and approved,
>and
>for which there is an appropriate FIXME note in the Ada sources:
>
>+FAIL: gnat.dg/specs/debug1.ads scan-a
21 matches
Mail list logo
