On Sat, 2010-05-15 at 07:51 +0200, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> On 05/14/2010 10:27 PM, Michael Raitza wrote:
> >
> > Up to now I have basic support up and running. The hash map to the loop
> > is missing and I have not figured out yet what I need it for, but Basile
> > mentioned it to be necessar
On 05/14/2010 10:27 PM, Michael Raitza wrote:
Up to now I have basic support up and running. The hash map to the loop
is missing and I have not figured out yet what I need it for, but Basile
mentioned it to be necessary to reliably attach data to the loop data
type.
Actually, this is not real
