On 11/05/2012 12:26 PM, David Brown wrote:
On 05/11/2012 11:33, Mischa Baars wrote:
On 11/05/2012 05:55 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 1:34 AM, Mischa Baars
wrote:
On 11/04/2012 02:45 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
There is no "original." The 32-bit and 64-bit ABIs are diff
I think this thread belongs on the gcc-help list, not here.
On 05/11/2012 11:33, Mischa Baars wrote:
On 11/05/2012 05:55 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 1:34 AM, Mischa Baars
wrote:
On 11/04/2012 02:45 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
There is no "original." The 32-bit and 64-bit ABIs are different.
The 64-bit ABI has always passed argu
On 11/05/2012 05:55 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 1:34 AM, Mischa Baars wrote:
On 11/04/2012 02:45 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
There is no "original." The 32-bit and 64-bit ABIs are different.
The 64-bit ABI has always passed arguments in registers. There is no
option to
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 1:34 AM, Mischa Baars wrote:
> On 11/04/2012 02:45 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>>
>> There is no "original." The 32-bit and 64-bit ABIs are different.
>> The 64-bit ABI has always passed arguments in registers. There is no
>> option to force the 64-bit compiler to pass arg
On 04/11/12 10:34, Mischa Baars wrote:
On 11/04/2012 02:45 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 12:55 AM, Mischa Baars
wrote:
On 11/02/2012 07:11 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Mischa Baars
wrote:
I have been writing this piece of example code, but
On 11/04/2012 02:45 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 12:55 AM, Mischa Baars wrote:
On 11/02/2012 07:11 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Mischa Baars
wrote:
I have been writing this piece of example code, but it seems that someone
has been modifyin
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 12:55 AM, Mischa Baars wrote:
> On 11/02/2012 07:11 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Mischa Baars
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I have been writing this piece of example code, but it seems that someone
>>> has been modifying the compiler in the meantime
On 11/03/2012 12:41 PM, Tim Prince wrote:
On 11/3/2012 3:32 AM, Mischa Baars wrote:
/usr/include/gnu/stubs.h:7:27: fatal error: gnu/stubs-32.h: No such
file or directory
which also prevents me from compiling the compiler under Fedora 17.
This means that I am both not able to compile progra
On 11/3/2012 3:32 AM, Mischa Baars wrote:
/usr/include/gnu/stubs.h:7:27: fatal error: gnu/stubs-32.h: No such
file or directory
which also prevents me from compiling the compiler under Fedora 17.
This means that I am both not able to compile programs in 32-bit mode
and help you with the co
On 11/02/2012 07:11 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Mischa Baars wrote:
I have been writing this piece of example code, but it seems that someone
has been modifying the compiler in the meantime such that arguments are now
passed in xmm registers instead of over the s
On 11/02/2012 07:11 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Mischa Baars wrote:
I have been writing this piece of example code, but it seems that someone
has been modifying the compiler in the meantime such that arguments are now
passed in xmm registers instead of over the s
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Mischa Baars wrote:
>
> I have been writing this piece of example code, but it seems that someone
> has been modifying the compiler in the meantime such that arguments are now
> passed in xmm registers instead of over the stack. Also the npx top of stack
> pointer i
13 matches
Mail list logo
