> James E Wilson
>> Jonathan Bastien-Filiatrault wrote:
>> * We have defined BIT_PER_WORD to 16 and UNITS_PER_WORD to 1. On this
>> DSP, there are two 40-bits accumulators. How do we make GCC take
>> advantage of this and which machine mode do we use ?
>
> GCC has little support for non-power-of-2
> "James" == James E Wilson writes:
James> On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 06:00, Paul Koning wrote:
>> I wonder if the work-in-progress PDP10 port
>> (http://pdp10.nocrew.org/gcc/) might help with this.
James> Interesting, but a hobbyist port for a 36-bit machine that was
James> end-of-lifed abo
On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 06:00, Paul Koning wrote:
> I wonder if the work-in-progress PDP10 port
> (http://pdp10.nocrew.org/gcc/) might help with this.
Interesting, but a hobbyist port for a 36-bit machine that was
end-of-lifed about 2 decades ago has little chance of success, unless
there are some v
> "James" == James E Wilson writes:
James> Jonathan Bastien-Filiatrault wrote:
>> * We have defined BIT_PER_WORD to 16 and UNITS_PER_WORD to 1. On
>> this DSP, there are two 40-bits accumulators. How do we make GCC
>> take advantage of this and which machine mode do we use ?
James> GCC
Jonathan Bastien-Filiatrault wrote:
* We have defined BIT_PER_WORD to 16 and UNITS_PER_WORD to 1. On this
DSP, there are two 40-bits accumulators. How do we make GCC take
advantage of this and which machine mode do we use ?
GCC has little support for non-power-of-2 sized accumulators.
Traditionall
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 04:10:57PM -0400, Jonathan Bastien-Filiatrault wrote:
>Me and Brian Richter are in the early development stage of the TI
> C54x DSP port of GCC. We have some technical/project management questions.
> I'll
> keep it short, so here it is:
>
> * How do we officially becom
Bryan Richter wrote:
Can someone assist me in getting the necessary copyright assignment
forms?
See
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-06/msg02298.html
for info on how to get the process started.
--
Jim Wilson, GNU Tools Support, http://www.SpecifixInc.com
Bryan Richter wrote:
> Joe Buck wrote:
> >
> >
> > Please read
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html
>
> Right- I've read this and I'm aware of the situation. I am prepared to 'keep
> my
> ducks in a row'. :)
After mulling it over for a day, I now realize that developing it separately is
Joe Buck wrote:
> Maybe not so cool, unless you are careful. The problem is that if you
> don't keep track of who submitted what, or if you accept some critical
> code from someone who is either unwilling or unable to legally contribute
> their work to the FSF, it can never be accepted as part of
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 06:10:19PM -0700, Bryan Richter wrote:
> I am working on porting GCC to the TI C54x.
Cool.
> months, similar to others who have attempted this project, but I am now
> in the process of setting up a repository on BerliOS so I can work with
> others.
Maybe not so cool, unle
10 matches
Mail list logo