Re: c-c++-common testsuite

2009-08-07 Thread Janis Johnson
On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 15:48 +0200, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote: > Janis, it would be extremely useful to have dg-options that are only > enabled for certain languages, so I can do > > /* { dg-options "-std=c99" { dg-require-effective-target c } } */ > /* { dg-options "" { dg-require-effective-target

Re: c-c++-common testsuite

2009-08-07 Thread Manuel López-Ibáñez
2009/8/7 Janis Johnson : > On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 00:06 +0200, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote: >> Often I want to test the exactly same testcase in C and C++, so I find >> myself adding duplicate tests under gcc.dg/ and g++.dg/. Would it be >> possible to have a shared testsuite dir that is run for both

Re: c-c++-common testsuite

2009-08-07 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 05:38:01PM -0700, Janis Johnson wrote: > I've been thinking about that lately, it would be useful for several > kinds of functionality. We'd want effective targets for the language > for using different options and for providing different error/warning > checks for each lan

Re: c-c++-common testsuite

2009-08-07 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009, Dave Korn wrote: > Possibly we could modify the algorithm that enumerates directories matching > "$tool.*" to look for (e.g.) "*$tool.*" and then name directories like > "c.c++.dg"? The algorithm is hardcoded in core DejaGnu (runtest.exp). -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codeso

Re: c-c++-common testsuite

2009-08-06 Thread Dave Korn
Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, Janis Johnson wrote: > >> I've been thinking about that lately, it would be useful for several >> kinds of functionality. We'd want effective targets for the language >> for using different options and for providing different error/warning >> checks fo

Re: c-c++-common testsuite

2009-08-06 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, Janis Johnson wrote: > I've been thinking about that lately, it would be useful for several > kinds of functionality. We'd want effective targets for the language > for using different options and for providing different error/warning > checks for each language. I haven't loo

Re: c-c++-common testsuite

2009-08-06 Thread Janis Johnson
On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 00:06 +0200, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote: > Often I want to test the exactly same testcase in C and C++, so I find > myself adding duplicate tests under gcc.dg/ and g++.dg/. Would it be > possible to have a shared testsuite dir that is run for both C and C++ > languages? (possib

Re: c-c++-common testsuite

2009-08-06 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote: > Often I want to test the exactly same testcase in C and C++, so I find > myself adding duplicate tests under gcc.dg/ and g++.dg/. Would it be > possible to have a shared testsuite dir that is run for both C and C++ > languages? (possibly with differ