On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Mark Tall wrote:
> 2009/5/28 Andrew Pinski:
>>
>> GCC see http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24314 .
>>
>
> hmm.. known since 2005. Is there some difficulty in fixing this ?
>
More likely it's pretty rare so nobody has gotten itchy enough to
scratch tha
2009/5/28 Andrew Pinski:
>
> GCC see http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24314 .
>
hmm.. known since 2005. Is there some difficulty in fixing this ?
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Mark Tall wrote:
> [Sorry, I pasted the wrong compiler output (but for the same bug).
> Below is the corrected e-mail. ]
>
> I've come across a possible issue with GCC's adherence to the C++
> standard for handling template code (gcc version 4.3.2 20081105 from
> F
[Sorry, I pasted the wrong compiler output (but for the same bug).
Below is the corrected e-mail. ]
I've come across a possible issue with GCC's adherence to the C++
standard for handling template code (gcc version 4.3.2 20081105 from
Fedora 10).
The following code compiles fine under GCC (using
