Boris Boesler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ok, I think I found it: GCC leaves control-flow operations as they
> are, if it can not place other operations in branch delay slots
> (represented as SEQUENCEs in GCC); or in other words: GCC does not
> represent empty delay slots.
>
> Is this
Am 12.12.2007 um 16:21 schrieb Ian Lance Taylor:
Boris Boesler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I "implemented" branch delay slots (define_delay) for my
architecture and I use the command line option -fdelayed-branch. But
branch delay slot filling is done just for a few candidates. Even for
the s
> I "implemented" branch delay slots (define_delay) for my
> architecture and I use the command line option -fdelayed-branch. But
> branch delay slot filling is done just for a few candidates. Even for
> the same rule within the same compilation unit (C file) it is done in
> a few cases but not i
Boris Boesler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I "implemented" branch delay slots (define_delay) for my
> architecture and I use the command line option -fdelayed-branch. But
> branch delay slot filling is done just for a few candidates. Even for
> the same rule within the same compilation unit (C
