On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 04:13:02PM -0800, Steve Ellcey wrote:
>
> I see, in an older GCC build output I see a compilation of
> insn-attrtab.c and I get the messages:
>
> /proj/opensrc/sje/svn/gcc.patch/trunk/gcc/config/ia64/itanium2.md: In
> function 'print_reservation':
> /proj/opensrc/sje/svn/
> > It seems to be coming from the reservation_names array set up in
> > print_reservation. One of the entries is:
> >
> > "(1_0m_bs,1_m_cont)|(1_0mi_bs,1_mi_cont|nothing)|(1_0mm_bs,1_mm_cont)|(1_0mf_bs,1_mf_cont|nothing)|(1_0b_bs,1_b_cont|nothing)|(1_0bb_bs,1_bb_cont|nothing)|(1_0mb_bs,1_mb_cont
> Well, my testing is done so far, including test suite runs for -m32/64
> solaris. But the important thing is, that _your_ implict declarations
> are fixed. Mine are.
Yes, my implicit declarations are fixed.
> Another thing, the day is going to an end here and I'll be not able to
> fix any is
Steve Ellcey wrote:
Hm, then I suggest at first to propose your patch to resolve the implict
declarations. ( I have the applied the same on sparc-solaris. )
I think that is a good idea. It gets us a bit further. Since my patch
is just an extension of yours why don't you go ahead and submit i
> Hm, then I suggest at first to propose your patch to resolve the implict
> declarations. ( I have the applied the same on sparc-solaris. )
>
> Andreas
Andreas,
I think that is a good idea. It gets us a bit further. Since my patch
is just an extension of yours why don't you go ahead and subm
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 02:10:33PM -0800, Steve Ellcey wrote:
>
> It seems to be coming from the reservation_names array set up in
> print_reservation. One of the entries is:
>
> "(1_0m_bs,1_m_cont)|(1_0mi_bs,1_mi_cont|nothing)|(1_0mm_bs,1_mm_cont)|(1_0mf_bs,1_mf_cont|nothing)|(1_0b_bs,1_b_cont|
Steve Ellcey wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 01:01:17PM -0800, Steve Ellcey wrote:
I took Zack's advice and put all the includes from insn-attrtab.c into
insn-automata.c. My current problem is that I get:
| insn-automata.c: In function 'print_reservation':
| insn-automata.c:22466: warning: stri
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 01:01:17PM -0800, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> >
> > I took Zack's advice and put all the includes from insn-attrtab.c into
> > insn-automata.c. My current problem is that I get:
> >
> > | insn-automata.c: In function 'print_reservation':
> > | insn-automata.c:22466: warning:
Zack Weinberg wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 01:01:17PM -0800, Steve Ellcey wrote:
I took Zack's advice and put all the includes from insn-attrtab.c into
insn-automata.c. My current problem is that I get:
| insn-automata.c: In function 'print_reservation':
| insn-automata.c:22466: warning: str
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 01:01:17PM -0800, Steve Ellcey wrote:
>
> I took Zack's advice and put all the includes from insn-attrtab.c into
> insn-automata.c. My current problem is that I get:
>
> | insn-automata.c: In function 'print_reservation':
> | insn-automata.c:22466: warning: string length
> > I still get implicitly declared errors for a couple of functions declared
> > in ia64-protos.h. I think the patch needs to be expanded to include
> > tm_p.h in addition to tm.h. I am testing that now.
>
> Shall I help? I have a fast sunfire here where I can cross check.
>
> I wait until you
Steve Ellcey wrote:
2006-01-25 Andreas Tobler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* genautomata.c (main): Add insn-config.h and recog.h to the
include list.
* Makefile.in (insn-automata.o): Adjust dependencies for the above
includes.
Andreas,
I don't know if you have checked
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 10:17:40AM -0800, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> > 2006-01-25 Andreas Tobler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > * genautomata.c (main): Add insn-config.h and recog.h to the
> > include list.
> > * Makefile.in (insn-automata.o): Adjust dependencies for the above
>
> 2006-01-25 Andreas Tobler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * genautomata.c (main): Add insn-config.h and recog.h to the
> include list.
> * Makefile.in (insn-automata.o): Adjust dependencies for the above
> includes.
Andreas,
I don't know if you have checked this in ye
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 08:07:34AM +0100, Andreas Tobler wrote:
> * genautomata.c (main): Add insn-config.h and recog.h to the
> include list.
> * Makefile.in (insn-automata.o): Adjust dependencies for the above
> includes.
Ok.
r~
Andreas Tobler wrote:
Zack Weinberg wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 12:17:00AM +0100, Andreas Tobler wrote:
Andreas Tobler wrote:
I get the following bootstrap break on solaris 8:
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
insn-automata.c: In function 'internal_insn_latency':
insn-automata.c:1969:
Zack Weinberg wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 12:17:00AM +0100, Andreas Tobler wrote:
Andreas Tobler wrote:
I get the following bootstrap break on solaris 8:
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
insn-automata.c: In function 'internal_insn_latency':
insn-automata.c:1969: warning: implicit decla
Zack Weinberg wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 12:17:00AM +0100, Andreas Tobler wrote:
Andreas Tobler wrote:
I get the following bootstrap break on solaris 8:
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
insn-automata.c: In function 'internal_insn_latency':
insn-automata.c:1969: warning: implicit decla
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 12:17:00AM +0100, Andreas Tobler wrote:
> Andreas Tobler wrote:
> >I get the following bootstrap break on solaris 8:
> >
> >cc1: warnings being treated as errors
> >insn-automata.c: In function 'internal_insn_latency':
> >insn-automata.c:1969: warning: implicit declaration o
Andreas Tobler wrote:
Hello
I can't hide :)
I get the following bootstrap break on solaris 8:
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
insn-automata.c: In function 'internal_insn_latency':
insn-automata.c:1969: warning: implicit declaration of function
'store_data_bypass_p'
gmake[3]: *** [insn-
20 matches
Mail list logo
