On Feb 20, 2008 10:15 AM, Danny Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Feb 20, 2008 10:02 PM, Danny Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Feb 18, 2008 10:59 AM, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > gcc/ChangeLog:
> > > 2008-02-17 Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> >
On Feb 20, 2008 10:02 PM, Danny Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 18, 2008 10:59 AM, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > gcc/ChangeLog:
> > 2008-02-17 Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > PR bootstrap/35218
> > * Makefile.in (build_file_translate): Ne
On Feb 18, 2008 10:59 AM, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
> 2008-02-17 Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> PR bootstrap/35218
> * Makefile.in (build_file_translate): New.
> (gcc-vers.texi): Use it for translating $(abs_srcdir).
> *
Weddington, Eric wrote:
Yes, because the one provided with MSYS is from texinfo 4.3, which
GCC finds too old. Apparently, MSYS-1.0.11 will come with texinfo
4.11, but it's still labeled "technology preview" for now.
I'm in the same boat here, msys-1.0.10, texinfo 4.3.
Is it the case that
* Joseph S. Myers wrote on Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 11:42:34PM CET:
> On Sun, 17 Feb 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
> > So, here's another alternative: fix the MinGW issue only, while not
> > regressing on any of the other reported bug (famous last words):
> > One way for path translation on MinGW wou
Lamo, Jo Inge; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: bootstrap broken on mingw
>
> * Weddington, Eric wrote on Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 11:08:58PM CET:
>
> > I'm tyring out your new patch now...
>
> Thanks. BTW, if it works, OK for trunk and 4.2? If that
> does not work
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> So, here's another alternative: fix the MinGW issue only, while not
> regressing on any of the other reported bug (famous last words):
> One way for path translation on MinGW would be to use
> CMD //c echo "@set srcdir" "$(abs_srcdir)"
If the abs_sr
* Weddington, Eric wrote on Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 11:08:58PM CET:
>
> No it wouldn't. I don't understand why reverting the patch would cause
> havoc. The 20080208 snapshot built just fine, even with an old texinfo
> version. I'd rather go back to that behaviour.
It didn't for me, with texinfo 4.8,
; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: bootstrap broken on mingw
>
> * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 10:59:07PM CET:
> > * Weddington, Eric wrote on Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 10:30:24PM CET:
> > > Is there any reason why we can't revert the patch that
> c
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 10:59:07PM CET:
> * Weddington, Eric wrote on Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 10:30:24PM CET:
> > Is there any reason why we can't revert the patch that caused this?
>
> Well if we do then we need to reopen PR 35148 which would be equivalent
> to requiring texi
* Weddington, Eric wrote on Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 10:30:24PM CET:
>
> Ok. I did the above and ran autoconf in the /gcc subdir. I got this
> error:
>
> if [ xinfo = xinfo ]; then \
> makeinfo --split-size=500 --split-size=500 --no-split -I
> . -I ../../gcc-4.3-20080215/gcc/doc \
>
Lamo, Jo Inge; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: bootstrap broken on mingw
>
> * Weddington, Eric wrote on Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 08:41:02PM CET:
> > >
> > > I'm willing to try, but running "autoconf" doesn't
> regenerate the
> > > configure f
* Weddington, Eric wrote on Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 08:32:26PM CET:
>
> With that patch I'm now getting:
>
> (echo "@set version-GCC 4.3.0"; \
> if [ "experimental" = "experimental" ]; \
> then echo "@set DEVELOPMENT"; \
> else echo "@clear DEVELOPMENT"; \
> fi) > gcc-vers.texiT
> /bin/sh: buil
* Weddington, Eric wrote on Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 08:41:02PM CET:
> >
> > I'm willing to try, but running "autoconf" doesn't regenerate the
> > configure file, what am I missing?
>
> I do:
>
> aclocal
> autoconf
>
> At the top level. aclocal 1.9.6, autoconf 2.59.
You need to run autoconf in t
Lamo, Jo Inge; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: bootstrap broken on mingw
>
> > gcc/ChangeLog:
> > 2008-02-17 Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > PR bootstrap/35218
> > * Makefile.in (build_file_translate): New.
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: Ralf Wildenhues [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2008 11:05 AM
> To: FX Coudert
> Cc: Richard Guenther; Joerg Wunsch; GCC Development;
> Weddington, Eric; Denis Chertykov; Anatoly Sokolov; Lamo, Jo Inge
> Subject:
> -Original Message-
> From: FX Coudert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2008 11:00 AM
> To: Ralf Wildenhues
> Cc: Richard Guenther; Joerg Wunsch; GCC Development;
> Weddington, Eric; Denis Chertykov; Anatoly Sokolov; Lamo, Jo Inge
> Subject:
gcc/ChangeLog:
2008-02-17 Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR bootstrap/35218
* Makefile.in (build_file_translate): New.
* config.build (build_file_translate): Set to `CMD //c' on MinGW.
* configure.ac (build_file_translate): Substitute it.
* configure
* FX Coudert wrote on Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 06:59:49PM CET:
>
> >If not, another
> >possibility would be to just require users on MinGW to update their
> >system texinfo installation.
>
> Weeks before the release? That doesn't give much time to anyone for
> getting it working and actually testin
One question I have, Eric and FX: do you both have self-built
texinfo on
MinGW?
Yes, because the one provided with MSYS is from texinfo 4.3, which
GCC finds too old. Apparently, MSYS-1.0.11 will come with texinfo
4.11, but it's still labeled "technology preview" for now.
Because the spe
[ adding gcc-patches ]
* Gerald Pfeifer wrote on Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 02:46:45PM CET:
> On Sun, 17 Feb 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > I see two possibilities: revert above patch, and list texinfo 4.11 as
> > prerequisite for building the pdf/dvi
>
> I'm not in favor of making texinfo 4.11 a req
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> I see two possibilities: revert above patch, and list texinfo 4.11 as
> prerequisite for building the pdf/dvi
I'm not in favor of making texinfo 4.11 a requirement. As far as I can
see it was released less than half a year ago and even recent release
* FX Coudert wrote on Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 12:54:05PM CET:
> >Actually there seems to be a recent change "backward" to that logic:
> >
> >2008-02-13 Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >PR other/35148
> >* Makefile.in (gcc-vers.texi): Use abs_srcdir for the value of
> >
Actually there seems to be a recent change "backward" to that logic:
2008-02-13 Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR other/35148
* Makefile.in (gcc-vers.texi): Use abs_srcdir for the value of
srcdir.
Doesn't look too good for mingw.
and we have PR35218 which seems
On Feb 17, 2008 12:41 PM, FX Coudert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I also see this failure on a native build for i386-pc-mingw32, so
> this is probably a mingw issue. Since i686-pc-mingw32 is a seconday
> platform, this makes it a release blocker (I've marked it as such in
> bugzilla, an
25 matches
Mail list logo
