Re: any recent changes to gcc test builds

Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:19:37 -0500 From: Joel Sherrill I don't have those in my board.exp: set_board_info cflags "-B${RTEMS_MAKEFILE_PATH}/lib/ -specs bsp_specs -qrtems -mcpu=603e" set_board_info ldflags "${RTEMS_CONFIG_OBJ}" Those should find $

Re: any recent changes to gcc test builds

> Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:19:37 -0500 > From: Joel Sherrill > I don't have those in my board.exp: > > set_board_info cflags "-B${RTEMS_MAKEFILE_PATH}/lib/ -specs bsp_specs > -qrtems -mcpu=603e" > set_board_info ldflags "${RTEMS_CONFIG_OBJ}" Those should find ${RTEMS_MAKEFILE_PATH}/lib/libm.

Re: any recent changes to gcc test builds

Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:37:02 -0500 From: Joel Sherrill I am confused at the gcc test results for RTEMS over the weekend. I have 1000s of failures across all the targets which look like this: Any ideas? I fixed a bug in Janis' GCC_EXEC_PR

Re: any recent changes to gcc test builds

> Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:37:02 -0500 > From: Joel Sherrill > I am confused at the gcc test results for RTEMS > over the weekend. I have 1000s of failures > across all the targets which look like this: > Any ideas? I fixed a bug in Janis' GCC_EXEC_PREFIX testsuite cleanup: