> To answer that, I'm afraid my patch is to blame:
>
> 2007-04-24 Richard Sandiford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * optabs.c (set_conv_libfunc): Prefer libgcc2's __ffsMM2 functions
> over an external ffs function.
>
> We used to use ffs to implement __builtin_ffs if sizeof (int),
> even
Andreas Krebbel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What I'm curious about is why this didn't occur earlier?! The symbol
> is available since 2003 and I can hardly imagine that no platform was
> ever in need of it till now.
To answer that, I'm afraid my patch is to blame:
2007-04-24 Richard Sandiford
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
> If it is ok to simply add that symbol to libgcc-std.ver in which category it
> would belong?
> I see "# libgcc1 integer symbols" in that file. Would that be appropriate?
You add it in the symbol versions for the next release, i.e. under
GCC_4.3.0.
