On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 8:51 AM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
> Richard Biener a écrit:
>
>> Support for constructing and destructing GC objects will be another
>> story of course.
>
> Just curious. Does supporting this take more than just defining new and
> delete
> operators that call ggc_alloc_*/gg
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 02:19:39PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
>> Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
>> >Now that we have transitioned to C++, do we still need to use
>> >placebo like XNEW and XNEWVEC in GCC source code proper?
>> >(I am not talking a
Richard Biener a écrit:
> Support for constructing and destructing GC objects will be another
> story of course.
Just curious. Does supporting this take more than just defining new and delete
operators that call ggc_alloc_*/ggc_free in there?
(OK, that and defining the object walking routines
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 02:19:39PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> >Now that we have transitioned to C++, do we still need to use
> >placebo like XNEW and XNEWVEC in GCC source code proper?
> >(I am not talking about uses in liberty.)
> >
> >Note that XNEW in particular do
Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Now that we have transitioned to C++, do we still need to use
>placebo like XNEW and XNEWVEC in GCC source code proper?
>(I am not talking about uses in liberty.)
>
>Note that XNEW in particular does not work for types with
>non-default constructors.
>
>We introduce
