Re: X32 project status update

2011-07-29 Thread H.J. Lu
Hi, This is the x32 project status update: https://sites.google.com/site/x32abi/ We have settled down on a preliminary system call number scheme: 1. In kernel, x86-64 and x32 share the same system call slot if they are the same. 2. First 512 system call slots are reserved for common and x86-64

Re: X32 project status update

2011-06-16 Thread H.J. Lu
Hi, This is the x32 project status update: https://sites.google.com/site/x32abi/ With the latest x32 kernel, glibc, gcc and gdb, everything works, including core dump and vDSO. I'd like to see x32 kernel system call numbers be finalized so that people don't have to recompile everything if the f

RE: X32 project status update

2011-05-23 Thread Anvin, H Peter
LKML; x32-...@googlegroups.com; Anvin, H Peter Subject: Re: X32 project status update On Saturday 21 May 2011 17:01:33 H.J. Lu wrote: > This is the x32 project status update: > > https://sites.google.com/site/x32abi/ > I've had another look at the kernel patch. It basically l

Re: X32 project status update

2011-05-22 Thread H.J. Lu
to...@gmail.com] >>> Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2011 12:39 PM Pacific Standard Time >>> To: Anvin, H Peter >>> Cc: x32-...@googlegroups.com; Arnd Bergmann; GCC Development; GNU C Library; >>> LKML >>> Subject: Re: X32 project status update >>> >>> On

Re: X32 project status update

2011-05-22 Thread H.J. Lu
d unsure for fanotify_mark. H.J. > --- >> -Original Message- >> From: H.J. Lu [hjl.to...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2011 12:39 PM Pacific Standard Time >> To: Anvin, H Peter >> Cc: x32-...@googlegroups.com; Arnd Bergmann; GCC Development; GNU C Li

Re: X32 project status update

2011-05-21 Thread H.J. Lu
.J. Lu [hjl.to...@gmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2011 12:39 PM Pacific Standard Time > To: Anvin, H Peter > Cc: x32-...@googlegroups.com; Arnd Bergmann; GCC Development; GNU C Library; > LKML > Subject: Re: X32 project status update > > On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 11:55 AM, H. Pet

RE: X32 project status update

2011-05-21 Thread Anvin, H Peter
U C Library; LKML Subject: Re: X32 project status update On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 11:55 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 05/21/2011 09:27 AM, H.J. Lu wrote: >> On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 8:34 AM, H.J. Lu wrote: >>> On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>>

Re: X32 project status update

2011-05-21 Thread H. Peter Anvin
On 05/21/2011 09:27 AM, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 8:34 AM, H.J. Lu wrote: >> On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>> On Saturday 21 May 2011 17:01:33 H.J. Lu wrote: This is the x32 project status update: https://sites.google.com/site/x32abi/ >>

Re: X32 project status update

2011-05-21 Thread H.J. Lu
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 8:34 AM, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> On Saturday 21 May 2011 17:01:33 H.J. Lu wrote: >>> This is the x32 project status update: >>> >>> https://sites.google.com/site/x32abi/ >>> >> >> I've had another look at the kernel patch.

Re: X32 project status update

2011-05-21 Thread H.J. Lu
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Saturday 21 May 2011 17:01:33 H.J. Lu wrote: >> This is the x32 project status update: >> >> https://sites.google.com/site/x32abi/ >> > > I've had another look at the kernel patch. It basically > looks all good, but the system call table a

Re: X32 project status update

2011-05-21 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Saturday 21 May 2011 17:01:33 H.J. Lu wrote: > This is the x32 project status update: > > https://sites.google.com/site/x32abi/ > I've had another look at the kernel patch. It basically looks all good, but the system call table appears to diverge from the x86_64 list for no (documented) reaso