--- On Mon, 5/30/11, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 1:14 PM,
> Robert Beeporbop
> wrote:
> > Thank you for the information!
> >
> > So it sounds like right now, I could use 4.6.0
> (4.7.0?), and be architecture-independent between processors
> of the same type. Like, code coul
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Robert Beeporbop wrote:
> Thank you for the information!
>
> So it sounds like right now, I could use 4.6.0 (4.7.0?), and be
> architecture-independent between processors of the same type. Like, code
> could be compiled to GIMPLE with no optimization for generic
ution, everything would be
recompiled anyways, so it doesn't matter if the GIMPLE format changes.
Rob
--- On Mon, 5/30/11, Richard Guenther wrote:
> From: Richard Guenther
> Subject: Re: WHOPR Linux distribution
> To: "Robert Beeporbop"
> Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Date:
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Robert Beeporbop wrote:
> Thanks to all the gcc developers!
>
> I am working on a Linux distribution which compiles all binaries statically
> at run-time with WHOPR. I hope to:
>
> = Have everything running insanely fast. I did some testing with a couple
> prog
