On 15/06/18 12:48, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm in the process of changing the vectorizer to consider all
> vector sizes as advertised by targetm.autovectorize_vector_sizes
> and to decide which one to use based on its cost model.
>
> I expect that to make sense for example when choosin
On Fri, 15 Jun 2018, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm in the process of changing the vectorizer to consider all
> > vector sizes as advertised by targetm.autovectorize_vector_sizes
> > and to decide which one to use based on its cost model.
> >
> > I expect that to make sense for exam
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm in the process of changing the vectorizer to consider all
> vector sizes as advertised by targetm.autovectorize_vector_sizes
> and to decide which one to use based on its cost model.
>
> I expect that to make sense for example when choosing between
> AVX128 and AVX256 since the l