On Sat, 5 Jun 2010, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> This is why OpenCL spec is not very good here really and not
> consistent with the rest of the C/C++ standard. In fact I would say
> we should treat it as the same as arrays out of bounds where it is
> just undefined at runtime rather than an error. Thi
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Artem Shinkarov
wrote:
> This is a reworked patch of Andrew Pinski "Subscripting on vector
> types" in terms of GSoC 2010 [Artjoms Sinkarovs].
>
> This patch allows to index individual elements of vector type in C.
> For example: vec[i], where vec is a vector with
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
> Sure - we can simply emit a warning here if you prefer.
Only with -Warray-bounds enabled like the rest of the C/C++ front-ends do :).
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 3:10 AM, Richard Guenther
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 11:39 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Artem Shinkarov
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> + error_at (loc, "index value is out of bound")
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 3:10 AM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 11:39 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Artem Shinkarov
>> wrote:
>>
>> + error_at (loc, "index value is out of bound");
>>
>> That is wrong. The Cell C/C++ language document says ou
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Artem Shinkarov
wrote:
> This is a reworked patch of Andrew Pinski "Subscripting on vector
> types" in terms of GSoC 2010 [Artjoms Sinkarovs].
>
> This patch allows to index individual elements of vector type in C.
> For example: vec[i], where vec is a vector with a
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 11:39 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Artem Shinkarov
> wrote:
>
> + error_at (loc, "index value is out of bound");
>
> That is wrong. The Cell C/C++ language document says out of bounds
> accesses are undefined (that is at runtime).
I thi
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Artem Shinkarov
wrote:
+ error_at (loc, "index value is out of bound");
That is wrong. The Cell C/C++ language document says out of bounds
accesses are undefined (that is at runtime).
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
On Fri, 4 Jun 2010, Richard Guenther wrote:
> The mark_addressable_vector change was at least semi-ugly. I think
> it is reasonable to require a constant index for register qualified vectors.
What does the Cell document describing the extension being implemented by
the original patch say here?
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 6:38 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, Artem Shinkarov wrote:
>
>> This is a reworked patch of Andrew Pinski "Subscripting on vector
>> types" in terms of GSoC 2010 [Artjoms Sinkarovs].
>
> We can't consider it without a copyright assignment.
>
>> The document
On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, Artem Shinkarov wrote:
> This is a reworked patch of Andrew Pinski "Subscripting on vector
> types" in terms of GSoC 2010 [Artjoms Sinkarovs].
We can't consider it without a copyright assignment.
> The documentation was not changed. May be there could be some more
> ideas to
11 matches
Mail list logo
