On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 12:30:35PM -0300, Andres Tiraboschi wrote:
> This raises a further question: why are gcc containers preferred over stl
> ones.
For consistency, because they play well together with the garbage
collection, because they are tuned for GCC's needs (e.g. to be usable even
in PO
This raises a further question: why are gcc containers preferred over stl ones.
Thanks, Andrés.
2016-05-03 12:02 GMT-03:00 Jakub Jelinek :
> On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 08:59:11AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 05/03/2016 08:44 AM, Andres Tiraboschi wrote:
>> >Hi,
>> >Does anyone know if there is a goo
On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 08:59:11AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 05/03/2016 08:44 AM, Andres Tiraboschi wrote:
> >Hi,
> >Does anyone know if there is a good reason for not using stl
> >containers in gcc sources?
> >I'm asking because I didn't find any use of them in the code I read.
> The GCC coding
On 05/03/2016 08:44 AM, Andres Tiraboschi wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know if there is a good reason for not using stl
containers in gcc sources?
I'm asking because I didn't find any use of them in the code I read.
The GCC coding conventions allow the use of the standard library; but
you have to be c
