On 6/18/20 4:31 AM, Shuai Wang wrote:
Hey Martin,
Thanks a lot for the info. I tried to play with __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc but
still quite confused on whether it can instrument extra basic blocks introduced
by ASAN. Let me present the GIMPLE code for your reference:
Probably not. My suggesti
Hey Martin,
Thanks a lot for the info. I tried to play with __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc
but still quite confused on whether it can instrument extra basic blocks
introduced by ASAN. Let me present the GIMPLE code for your reference:
Given the following C code:
int main(int argc ,char **argv)
{
On 6/17/20 8:57 AM, Shuai Wang wrote:
Hello Martin,
The issue is that I want to count the coverage of "true/false" branches taken
in sanitizer's if conditions..
I see. Well, you may abuse a bit the existing:
-fsanitize-coverage=trace-pc
Enable coverage-guided fuzzing code i
Hello Martin,
The issue is that I want to count the coverage of "true/false" branches
taken in sanitizer's if conditions..
Best,
Shuai
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 2:52 PM Martin Liška wrote:
> On 6/17/20 5:40 AM, Shuai Wang via Gcc wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
>
> Hello.
>
> Right now, coverage informati
On 6/17/20 5:40 AM, Shuai Wang via Gcc wrote:
Hello,
Hello.
Right now, coverage information reports line execution of statements that
are present in the original source code.
Can you make a mapping of the instrumented code to statements that are present
in the original source code?
Martin
