> This has nothing to do with Oracle v. Google, but with GCC policy of not
> requiring a copyright assignment for small patches from the first-time
> contributors (which Paolo knows as a long-time GCC hacker).
I think it's a valid reminder that that policy needs to be interpreted
carefully and
On 10/06/2013 03:19 PM, Morwenn Ed wrote:
Ok, no problem then, here is the patch. And the changelog. I hope they
are ok, I have never properly submitted anything before.
Patch looks great to me, thanks. I'm applying it.
Thanks,
Paolo.
On 07.10.2013 9:54, Jeff Hammond wrote:
Given your company (Oracle) sued Google over 9 lines of Java (the now
infamous rangeCheck function), I hardly think it's appropriate for you
to discourage someone from following through with copyright assignment
for a minor contribution.
This has nothing
Given your company (Oracle) sued Google over 9 lines of Java (the now
infamous rangeCheck function), I hardly think it's appropriate for you
to discourage someone from following through with copyright assignment
for a minor contribution.
Jeff
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Subject: RE: Update the c++1y/c++14 support page
> From: paolo.carl...@oracle.com
> Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2013 14:48:27 +0200
> To: morwen...@hotmail.fr; gcc@gcc.gnu.org
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Morwenn Ed ha scritto:
>>Well
Hi,
Morwenn Ed ha scritto:
>Well, it never got to sign the copyright assignment.
Certainly you don't need an assignment for 3 lines of docs!
Paolo
> Subject: Re: Update the c++1y/c++14 support page
> From: paolo.carl...@oracle.com
> Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2013 14:06:32 +0200
> To: morwen...@hotmail.fr; gcc@gcc.gnu.org
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Morwenn Ed ha scritto:
>>Three ne
Hi,
Morwenn Ed ha scritto:
>Three new papers were adopted at the Chicago meeting a few days ago:
>* [[deprecated]] attribute (N3760)
>* Sized deallocation (N3778)
>* Single-quotation-mark as a digit separator (N3481)
>
>Shouldn't the GCC C++1y/C++14 support page be modified to reflect these
>ad
