Re: Triplet for ARM Linux HardFP ABI, again

On 21/02/11 10:12, Guillem Jover wrote: This was already discussed in this list some time ago [0]. But it came up again when restarting the discussion for the proposed new armhf port for Debian. [0] My arguments for why a distinct triplet is n

Re: Triplet for ARM Linux HardFP ABI, again

Hi! On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 16:12:32 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > Here is an amended patch that handles Ada as EABI-only on ARM. > diff --git a/gcc/ada/gcc-interface/Makefile.in > b/gcc/ada/gcc-interface/Makefile.in > index b64ba55..7559efb 100644 > --- a/gcc/ada/gcc-interface/Makefile.in > +++

Re: Triplet for ARM Linux HardFP ABI, again

Here is an amended patch that handles Ada as EABI-only on ARM. Are there any other comments on the appropriateness of this globbing change? Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the wo

Re: Triplet for ARM Linux HardFP ABI, again

Guillem Jover writes: > On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 17:59:06 +, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > > On Mon, 21 Feb 2011, Guillem Jover wrote: > > > if you'd consider accepting something ressembling the attached patch > > > > A pre-existing condition, but in general where the code you're changing > > h

Re: Triplet for ARM Linux HardFP ABI, again

On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 17:59:06 +, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Mon, 21 Feb 2011, Guillem Jover wrote: > > if you'd consider accepting something ressembling the attached patch > > A pre-existing condition, but in general where the code you're changing > hardcodes "gnu" that's wrong - arm*-*-lin

Re: Triplet for ARM Linux HardFP ABI, again

On Mon, 21 Feb 2011, Guillem Jover wrote: > if you'd consider accepting something ressembling the attached patch A pre-existing condition, but in general where the code you're changing hardcodes "gnu" that's wrong - arm*-*-linux-uclibceabi is also meant to be valid. So if you allow a suffix he